Open Home and Property Inspection Liability: Where the Risk Sits
Open homes, private inspections and on-site appraisals are the highest-frequency moment of exposure for Australian property businesses. A look at where claims arise and how Public Liability and Professional Indemnity respond.
An open home is one of the most ordinary parts of business work and one of the most concentrated moments of exposure. The business holds temporary control of a property it does not own, opens it to members of the public it has not vetted, and is the party present when anything that happens during that period happens. Inspections, appraisals and pre-auction walk-throughs sit on the same spectrum.
The insurance response depends on who suffered the loss and what they say the business did or failed to do. The relevant policies are Public Liability and Professional Indemnity, and they respond to different categories of allegation.
Injury to a visitor
The most common open home claim is a slip, trip or fall by a visitor – a wet floor following rain, a step that was not adequately signed, a loose rug, a poorly lit stairwell. The business is the party present, and is generally the party named first.
The defence comes back to the inspection of the property prior to opening it, the management of the visitor flow and any warnings given. Public Liability funds the defence and, where appropriate, the settlement. Where the underlying cause is a defect that pre-existed the open home and was the vendor's or landlord's responsibility, the vendor's or landlord's policy is typically also engaged, and the two insurers resolve the contribution between them.
Property damage to the home
A second pattern of claims concerns damage to the property itself during an inspection or open home. A visitor damages a fixture. A glass door is shattered. A floor finish is marked by the volume of foot traffic. The vendor alleges that the business failed to take reasonable steps to protect the property and seeks the cost of repair.
“The business walks in at 10:55am and leaves at 11:35am. In those 40 minutes it owes a duty to the visitors, to the vendor, and to the tenant – and a different policy responds to each.”
Public Liability typically responds to physical damage caused to the property the business is in temporary control of, but the wording around 'property in care, custody or control' needs to be read carefully – a number of older Public Liability wordings exclude or sub-limit that exposure, and the open home is precisely the situation where the carve-back matters.
Theft allegations and missing items
Theft allegations following an open home are a recurring source of disputes. A vendor reports an item missing after a Saturday open. A tenant reports the same following a routine inspection. The allegation is generally that the business failed to take reasonable steps to supervise the visitors.
These claims usually proceed as Professional Indemnity matters rather than Public Liability matters, because the allegation is about the business's conduct of the open home rather than a physical incident. The defence focuses on the sign-in process, the supervision arrangements, the number of visitors present and any subsequent investigation. Professional Indemnity funds that defence.
Access, lockout and key disputes
A smaller but recurring set of claims arises from access. Keys lost or copied. Lockboxes opened in error. Entry to a tenanted property without proper notice. A vendor or tenant locked out following the inspection. These claims generally proceed as Professional Indemnity matters, and the defence comes back to the business's standard procedures.
Tenanted properties – the additional layer
Where the open home or inspection is conducted on a tenanted property, an additional layer of duty applies. The business owes obligations to the tenant under residential tenancies legislation, including notice, supervision and the protection of the tenant's possessions. A breach of those obligations is generally a Professional Indemnity matter rather than a Public Liability matter.
What we look at when we review the policy
When we review a Public Liability and Professional Indemnity program for an agency, the open home conversation focuses on a few specific items. Whether the Public Liability wording responds to property in the business's temporary care, custody or control without a restrictive sub-limit. Whether the Professional Indemnity wording responds to theft allegations and access disputes as professional-conduct matters. Whether the wording responds to inspection work on tenanted properties under residential tenancies legislation. Whether the limits are appropriate for the volume of inspection activity the business conducts. And whether the business's standard open home procedure is consistent with the way the policies have been arranged.
Open homes and inspections are the day-to-day rhythm of an agency. The policies behind them should respond without argument.
If you would like a review of how open home and inspection exposures are arranged in your business program, we are happy to walk through it with you.
Need help understanding how this may affect your cover?
Contact the RMA Insurance Brokers team before making changes to your insurance arrangements.
Any financial product advice in this content is provided by Insura Broking Group T/as RMA Insurance Brokers AR No. 1267581. This material is general in nature and has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Accordingly, before acting on it, you should consider its appropriateness to your circumstances. RMA Insurance Brokers is an AR of McCormick Harris Insurance AFSL No. 238979.
Information is current as at the date the article is written as specified within it but is subject to change. RMA Insurance Brokers make no representation as to the accuracy or completeness of the information. Various third parties may have contributed to the production of this content. All information is subject to copyright and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of RMA Insurance Brokers.
